We are facing a strange issue with remote users attempting to connect via Global Protect to access network resources behind the PA-220.
The issue is that when you connect to the VPN, the Global Protect client will not communicate with any resources on the network until you refresh the connection 4 - 5 times., however sometimes it will allow access to resources first time - it is sporadic, however more often than not you have to refresh the connection multiple times.
The Global Protect client will also sometimes auto disconnect and re-connect within the first minute, but this doesn’t always happen.
I have checked that Global Protect is receiving the correct IP and DNS servers which are present even when you cannot ping anything behind the PA-220. The only noticeable thing is that on the Global Protect client status window, there are are zero bytes in and zero packets in, however the bytes out and packets out increase indicating the client is attempting to talk to the gateway.
We were running a different version of the Global Protect client which was also facing the same issue.
Has anyone experienced a similar issue, or would anyone know of what may be causing this or how we can troubleshoot, I can provide logs if that helps from the client.
Not sure if it relates but try disabling ipv6 on your remote machines. There was an issue not too long ago (the panos version escapes me) that turned out to be a bug having ipv6 enabled and ssl vpn.
Had a similar issue on 11.0.4-h1 where HIPChecks would pass for a few minutes but then fail with the DB only retaining 1 HIPCheck for any domain asset, mysteriously if using only Host-ID/Serial of the device without it being in the domain it would work without issue.
We got it fixed by upgrading to 11.1.2-h3, an alternate solution was also to down grade to 11.0.3-h10.
Seems in your case there is a later preferred release, wondering if it may be fixed. You may want to get Palo Alto engineer to answer the question if the issue has been reported. Apparently ours they are aware of the issue but had no ETA of when it would be fixed for 11.0.x so that is why they investigated and mentioned about upgrading or downgraded.